Do we need protected attributes in logs to monitor fairness?

Not always. Start with operational slices (locale, channel, device) and only add protected attributes under a governed process (legal review, access controls, retention limits). If you do use protected attributes, treat them like regulated data.

What’s the minimum viable fairness monitoring setup?

Log prediction events with `model_version`, decision, score, latency, fallback, and a few slice fields; backfill outcomes; run a daily job computing selection rate and TPR by slice; alert on sustained gaps with minimum sample sizes.

How do we avoid alert fatigue from fairness metrics?

Use sample-size gates, rolling windows, and burn-rate style alerts (fast and slow). Also page on regressions tied to deploys, not on every statistically insignificant wobble.

How is fairness monitoring different for LLMs?

You’re monitoring generated content and tool decisions, not just a score. You need prompt/corpus versioning, groundedness checks (citations), content safety evals, and token/latency observability to prevent timeout-driven behavior changes.

Ai-delivery · Dec 12, 2025 · 8 minute read

Your Model Isn’t “Biased” Until Prod Proves It: Fairness Monitoring That Actually Pages You

Automated bias detection in production isn’t a slide deck—it’s instrumentation, slice metrics, and guardrails wired into the same on-call muscle memory as latency and errors.

Back to all posts

Your Model Isn’t “Biased” Until Prod Proves It: Fairness Monitoring That Actually Pages You

Key takeaways

Implementation checklist