The Strangler Monolith: How We Safely Modernized a Legacy System One Service at a Time

A pragmatic case study on transforming a brittle, single-tier application into a maintainable, observable, and scalable architecture without stopping business velocity.

A legacy system that can walk is a legacy system that can win the next downtime, not the next outage.
Back to all posts

We inherited a payments platform that had grown beyond its original purpose, mutating into a spaghetti of database mirrors, call stacks, and brittle integration points. Peak events exposed chronic latency, and a single hot path in the checkout service would cascade into timeouts across downstream services. The business

side effects were brutal: customer refunds due to latency, support churn, and an engineering team stretched thin trying to patch symptoms instead of addressing root causes. The leadership team faced a choice: rewrite now and risk a multi-quarter blackout, or engineer a staged modernization that preserves velocity while

reduces risk. We chose a Strangler Fig approach: carve out well-defined service boundaries, route traffic incrementally, and validate each increment against measurable SLIs before turning off old code paths. This wasn’t about a cute architecture diagram; it was about cadence, instrumentation, and governance that align–

with real business constraints like Black Friday readiness, regulatory reporting windows, and multi-region data replication. The plan relied on concrete instrumentation, strictly scoped milestones, and GitOps fences to prevent regressions from leaking into production.

The first concrete milestone was a tiny but impactful microservice—the pricing engine—built as a separate service with its own data boundary and an API surface compatible with the monolith’s expectations. We didn’t rewrite all at once; we rewrote the critical path and progressively validated end-to-end latency, error率,

and data consistency. This approach kept revenue streams online while we refactored the surrounding modules. The team adopted a shared tooling stack—OpenTelemetry for tracing, Tempo/Jaeger for traces, Grafana for dashboards, and a greenfield CI/CD cadence powered by ArgoCD and Argo Rollouts—to ensure that every release

could be gated by real telemetry and automatic rollback if a defined SLO slipped. In parallel, the data layer moved toward the outbox pattern, ensuring events were reliably emitted and consumed by new services without forcing a full database migration upfront. The outcome wasn’t a flashy rewrite; it was a controlled, 6

Related Resources

Key takeaways

  • Staged modernization preserves business uptime while delivering measurable architectural improvements
  • GitOps with progressive delivery reduces blast radius and MTTR during migration
  • End-to-end observability is non-negotiable for safe incremental rewrites
  • Outbox and dual-write patterns are essential for data consistency in a hybrid architecture
  • Runbooks, SLIs/SLOs, and incident rituals must evolve in step with architecture changes

Implementation checklist

  • Map bounded contexts and draft a Strangler Fig plan in Jira with 2–3 microservice candidates per milestone
  • Install and instrument OpenTelemetry across the stack, exporting traces to Tempo Jaeger and dashboards in Grafana
  • Implement a gateway or Istio route layer to progressively shift traffic from the monolith to new services
  • Adopt GitOps via ArgoCD and Argo Rollouts for canary deployments with explicit success criteria and rollback gates
  • Apply the outbox pattern and dual-write for critical data stores, validating with nightly data consistency checks
  • Create runbooks and postmortems tied to migration milestones, with MTTR targets and SLO dashboards

Questions we hear from teams

Why did you choose the Strangler Fig pattern over a full rewrite?
Because it buys safety, keeps revenue online, and delivers measurable progress in bite-sized milestones you can actually inspect and adjust.
How do you prove success during migration?
We anchored every increment to SLIs/SLOs, tracked latency, error rates, and MTTR, and used a canary-based rollout with automated rollback if thresholds were breached.
What role does culture play in this modernization?
Culture is the force multiplier; you need blameless postmortems, runbooks, and shared ownership so teams treat modernization as a continuous product rather than a project.

Ready to modernize your codebase?

Let GitPlumbers help you transform AI-generated chaos into clean, scalable applications.

Book a modernization assessment Explore our services

Related resources