Why not introduce Istio or a full service mesh?

Under a 7‑week deadline with no prior mesh experience, a service mesh adds operational risk and learning curve. We achieved traffic shaping, mTLS (where needed via ALB + NLB), and canaries with NGINX Ingress + Argo Rollouts. We’d revisit a mesh once SLOs are stable and team capacity allows.

How did you handle Terraform drift safely?

We audited live resources against state, tagged orphans, and used `terraform import` selectively. Remote state with locking (S3 + DynamoDB) and `pre-commit` policies prevented regressions. No more console‑click ops.

What about database changes under canary?

We applied expand/contract migrations: additive schema first, code that reads old+new fields, then cleanup. For high‑risk changes we used `pglogical` and feature flags to gate writes until confidence grew.

How did you mitigate AI‑generated code risks?

We identified AI‑authored hotspots via static analysis and PR history, quarantined behind feature flags, added circuit breakers and idempotency, and required tests on the golden paths. That’s vibe code cleanup without the witch hunt.

Case-studies · Dec 5, 2025 · 9 minute read

The Launch Window We Couldn’t Miss: How a 7‑Week Modernization Unblocked a Regulated Fintech’s Go‑Live

An anonymized case study of a late‑stage fintech that had an immovable launch date, creaking infrastructure, and a monolith that couldn’t scale. We cut scope intelligently, modernized the release stack, and shipped on time—without a rewrite.

Alex Kim

Partner, GitPlumbers

20 years in the trenches across fintech, e‑commerce, and SaaS. Led platform and SRE teams at two unicorns, survived three PCI audits, and has cut more post‑mortems than he cares to admit.

“We don’t need shiny. We need predictable.” — anonymized CTO

Back to all posts

A launch window we couldn’t miss

This wasn’t a greenfield fairy tale. It was a regulated fintech with an immovable date, a partnership contract on the line, and a monolith in the way. We’ve all been there: flaky CI, Terraform drift, Kubernetes bleeding money, and a team too smart to fall for a rewrite fantasy. We had 7 weeks to make prod boring enough to ship.

What we walked into

Industry context: Late‑stage fintech, SOC 2 and PCI scope expanding, partner certification window in 9 weeks. Public relations already queued; failure would push revenue recognition out a quarter.
Constraints: Hiring freeze, infra budget capped, change freeze the final week, no time for Istio or a domain‑wide microservices migration.
Tech stack: Rails 6 monolith with Sidekiq, two Node/TypeScript “services” in name only, EKS 1.25, Terraform in three repos with hand‑applied patches, Jenkins plus ad hoc GitHub Actions, Prometheus with partial coverage, Grafana no single dashboard, and traces in name only.
Pain: Weekly deploys with Friday “all‑hands on deck”. CI runs at 38 minutes with 62% success. P95 1.2s on the payments API. Change failure rate ~24%. MTTR around 6 hours. And yes, a few files of AI‑generated vibe code that “worked on staging.”

Related Resources

Key takeaways

Minimum viable modernization beats rewrites when the clock is ticking: stabilize deploys, instrument the golden paths, and control blast radius.
GitOps plus Argo Rollouts gave safe canaries without introducing a heavyweight service mesh under deadline.
Right‑sizing K8s with requests/limits, HPA, and cluster‑autoscaler cut spend 28% and improved P95 latency 3.4x.
CI wins compound: caching, test sharding, and explicit health checks turned a 38‑minute pipeline into 12 minutes with 94% success rate.
SLOs aligned the org: error budgets drove release decisions, not HiPPOs. MTTR dropped 87% with real on‑call visibility.

Implementation checklist

Map one release path end‑to‑end and instrument it with `RED`/`USE` metrics before touching architecture.
Introduce GitOps (`ArgoCD`) and a single promotion workflow; forbid `kubectl apply` in production.
Add canary deployments (`Argo Rollouts`) with 10/30/60 weighted traffic and automated rollback on SLO burn.
Lock Terraform state, remove manual drift, and add `pre-commit` policy checks.
Right‑size Kubernetes: set resource requests/limits, enable HPA, and install cluster autoscaler.
Stand up centralized tracing with OpenTelemetry; define SLOs and wire alerting to burn rate, not noise.
Quarantine AI‑generated “vibe code”; refactor high‑risk modules and require tests on critical paths.
Use feature flags to decouple release from deploy; dark‑launch risky features under `LaunchDarkly`.

Questions we hear from teams

Why not introduce Istio or a full service mesh?: Under a 7‑week deadline with no prior mesh experience, a service mesh adds operational risk and learning curve. We achieved traffic shaping, mTLS (where needed via ALB + NLB), and canaries with NGINX Ingress + Argo Rollouts. We’d revisit a mesh once SLOs are stable and team capacity allows.
How did you handle Terraform drift safely?: We audited live resources against state, tagged orphans, and used `terraform import` selectively. Remote state with locking (S3 + DynamoDB) and `pre-commit` policies prevented regressions. No more console‑click ops.
What about database changes under canary?: We applied expand/contract migrations: additive schema first, code that reads old+new fields, then cleanup. For high‑risk changes we used `pglogical` and feature flags to gate writes until confidence grew.
How did you mitigate AI‑generated code risks?: We identified AI‑authored hotspots via static analysis and PR history, quarantined behind feature flags, added circuit breakers and idempotency, and required tests on the golden paths. That’s vibe code cleanup without the witch hunt.

Ready to modernize your codebase?

Let GitPlumbers help you transform AI-generated chaos into clean, scalable applications.

Talk to an engineer about an upcoming launch Get the modernization checklist