The AI Hallucination That Triggered Overnight Refunds - And How We Built Guardrails That Stopped the Next One
Instrumentation, guardrails, and real-time evaluation for AI-enabled flows that prevent user-impacting model degradation.
Your observability stack went dark during peak traffic--and your AI model hallucinated in real time; heres how we prevented the next one from landing.Back to all posts
In production, AI is not a black box you can test once and forget. It touches real users, triggers revenue-impacting flows, and can regress in minutes when data or context shifts. We've learned this the hard way, watching latency spike while hallucinations crept into user-facing responses, then watching customer trust,
erode as refunds piled up. The fix isn't a better model alone; it's a disciplined observability pattern that ties inputs, inferences, and outcomes together in real time.
We built dashboards that answer the magic questions: is the model drifting in production data? is its output still aligned with policy and facts? is latency staying within SLOs? By instrumenting every call, tagging each inference with version and feature flags, we transformed AI health into a measurable, actionable sig
nal. The dashboards don't just show pretty charts; they drive runbooks and guardrails that either throttle, gate, or fallback gracefully when signals look off.
In the following sections we'll walk through the concrete steps we've used to turn AI into a safe, observable service. You'll see the exact metrics, the guardrails-as-code pattern, and a practical implementation blueprint you can tailor to your stack.
Related Resources
Key takeaways
- End-to-end visibility bridging inputs, outputs, and performance beats siloed metrics.
- Guardrails must be codified and tested - policy-as-code artifacts should be shipped with every release and validated in canary runs.
- Shadow inference and data contracts reduce risk without slowing velocity; pair them with automated runbooks and weekly drills to normalize safety at scale.
- AI health metrics must cover drift and hallucination in addition to latency.
Implementation checklist
- Define AI SLOs and alerting thresholds for drift, hallucination rate, latency, and policy violations.
- Instrument AI endpoints with OpenTelemetry and Prometheus; capture latency percentiles, error_rate, model_version, and input_signature.
- Compute drift scores using KL divergence or JS divergence; gate actions when drift crosses threshold and emit alerts.
- Implement policy-as-code guardrails (OPA/Kyverno) to block risky inferences and require fallback responses for high-risk inferences.
- Deploy a shadow/inference harness to compare production outputs against a reference model without user impact.
- Establish runbooks, on-call rotations, and weekly AI reliability drills; track MTTR and alert fatigue.
Questions we hear from teams
- What signals should I collect to spot AI degradation in production?
- Collect latency, error_rate, drift scores (KL divergence or JS distance), hallucination or factuality metrics, input_feature_hashes, model_version, and guardrail decisions; tie them to alert thresholds.
- How do you stop an AI issue from impacting users while you fix it?
- Deploy a shadow/inference path, enable canary routing with automated fallbacks, and gate high-risk inferences with policy-as-code guardrails so users see safe responses while the root cause is remediated.
- What indicates success for AI production guards?
- Lower MTTR for AI incidents, stable AI SLOs with burn-rate under target, drift and hallucination metrics trending down, and dashboards that trigger preemptive remediation before users report issues.
Ready to modernize your codebase?
Let GitPlumbers help you transform AI-generated chaos into clean, scalable applications.